Logo

Low-Flow Toilets Vs. Traditional Toilets

October 22, 2021

Introduction

Toilets are a basic necessity in our daily lives, but little do we realize that it's also one of the biggest sources of water consumption. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), toilets account for almost 30% of total household water usage, making it a significant area of concern when it comes to sustainable living. This is where low-flow toilets come into play, providing an alternative to traditional toilets that aim to reduce water consumption without compromising on functionality. In this blog post, we will compare low-flow toilets and traditional toilets, highlighting the pros and cons of each to give you a better idea of which is more sustainable and eco-friendly.

Low-Flow Toilets

Low-flow toilets or low-flush toilets are designed to use less water per flush than traditional toilets. According to the EPA, a low-flow toilet uses just 1.6 gallons of water per flush, while older models may use up to 7 gallons of water per flush. This means that low-flow toilets can save a significant amount of water, with the potential to save almost 18,000 gallons of water per year for a family of four. Additionally, low-flow toilets also reduce water bills, as the less water used, the less money you need to spend on it.

However, the downside of low-flow toilets is that they may not work as effectively as traditional toilets. Some users report having to flush a low-flow toilet multiple times to get rid of all the waste, which can ultimately negate any water savings. Additionally, low-flow toilets may require more maintenance, as smaller water volumes can lead to clogs and blockages.

Traditional Toilets

Traditional toilets have been around for years and are the norm in most households. These toilets use anywhere between 3-7 gallons of water per flush, making them a major source of water wastage. However, traditional toilets are known for their efficiency, as they effectively remove waste in one flush, making them a reliable and convenient option.

The downside of traditional toilets is that they are incredibly wasteful when it comes to water consumption. An average family of four can easily use up to 11,000 gallons of water per year on just flushing the toilet, making traditional toilets far from eco-friendly.

Conclusion

Low-flow toilets and traditional toilets both have their pros and cons, and it comes down to personal preferences and priorities. Low-flow toilets are designed with sustainability in mind, as they use less water and can potentially save you money on water bills. However, they may not be as effective as traditional toilets, and they require more maintenance to keep them working well. In contrast, traditional toilets are reliable and efficient, but they waste a lot of water and are far from being eco-friendly.

At the end of the day, the choice comes down to what is most important to you: sustainability or efficiency. We hope this blog post has given you a better idea of the differences between low-flow toilets and traditional toilets while helping you make an informed decision.

References

© 2023 Flare Compare